The positive side of bloatware is that the abundance of features allows for infinite modes of expression. The customization abilities of Office products is outstanding, with templates and settings to make minute to drastic changes to your document. Using these features creatively can lead to interesting and dynamic pieces of art, which is Byrne's point, but only so long as the user knows what they are doing.
There are so many options and customizations in Powerpoint that one can work with the program for years and merely scratch the surface. So instruction is key, and frequently lessons are taught at multiple levels, such as "Beginner Powerpoint" and "Advanced Powerpoint" I and II. Since most people would rather take courses on the evolutionary growth of fungi than take several courses on Office software, the majority of us only have a basic (and possibly outdated) knowledge of Powerpoint. The geek speak and terms used in the software also prevent people from learning on their own, since a lot of the check boxes and pull down lists only make sense to the tech savvy or professional computer workers. In this sense, Powerpoint and other Office products are indeed, evil.
I agree with both Byrne and Tufte. Yes, Powerpoint can be used to create beautiful and meaningful things, but until you possess the knowledge and skill then all you produce will be crimes against humanity. At some point the bloatware needs to come to a pinnacle where the programmers can look back, simplify and allow the user to make better work with less knowledge. Until then we will have publishing programs that will get more complex and more buried with each new carnation.
Although, as someone who's versed in Microsoft Office, I have to say that Access is infinitely more sinister than Powerpoint.
Byrne, David. "Learning to Love Powerpoint." Wired 11.09: Learning to Love PowerPoint. Wired.com, Sept. 2003. Web. 23 Jan. 2011. .
Tufte, Edward R. "PowerPoint Is Evil." Wired 11.09: PowerPoint Is Evil. Wired.com, Sept. 2003. Web. 23 Jan. 2011. .